Turn to BallWasher Math for the answers

A couple of weeks ago, Ballwasher Hughes asked an important question about whether a person's testicular inventory may impact one's eligibility to be a Ballwasher. The question he posed went like this:

"If one of our members had testicular cancer and lost his testicles and despite good hygiene...would he still be considered a BallWasher??? Maybe you would only have to have one remaining to be in the group, because it is not the 'Balls-washers'?"

Well, there's no better time than this to shine the light of clarity with "Ballwasher Math"! Here's the updated answer to his burning question:

Great Question! This is really a very simple matter, my little furrow-browed friend. There is no actual testicular prerequisite for Ballwasher membership, as Ballwashers such as Dawn T. and Julie B. can readily attest. But don't just take my word for this. Let's apply the rigor of Ballwasher mathematics to explore this issue quantitatively!

• For instance, if a Ballwasher with testicles (commonly represented as "T=2") were, for some unfortunate reason, to end up with a reduced number (ie. T=1 or T=0), then one can still remain a Ballwasher (B=1) as long as he continues to uphold our guiding Ballwasher principles (see top section of Blog site).
  
• In situations where T<=0 (ie. Eric Ozanam & Gregg Ramsey) you will always find that B=0. However, regardless of whether or not T<=2, it's still possible to have B=0 when one fails to live up to our Ballwasher tenets.
• It's also good to note the rare occurrence where T>2 (ie. Ballwasher BRIT) in which case B=1 no matter what!

Thank you for your insightful question, and have a great day!

-Nort